IFRS 18: Key Changes and Implications for Singapore Companies Ahead of 2027 Adoption
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which introduces a fundamental overhaul to how financial performance is presented. Singapore is expected to adopt IFRS 18 into SFRS(I), with an effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
Given the extent of the changes—and the requirement to restate comparative information—entities should begin preparing well ahead of the effective date.
Summary of Key Changes Under IFRS 18
Mandatory New Profit or Loss Categories
IFRS 18 replaces the traditional P&L format with three standardised, prescriptive categories:
Operating
Investing
Financing
All income and expenses must be reclassified into these categories based on detailed application guidance. This creates greater consistency across entities and industries, but requires extensive remapping of existing accounts.
Introduction of Management-Defined Performance Measures (MPMs)
IFRS 18 formally defines and regulates Management-Defined Performance Measures, which are subtotals of income and expenses that:
Are used in public communications outside the financial statements; and
Reflect management’s view of an aspect of financial performance of the entity as a whole.
Examples include Adjusted EBITDA, underlying profit, or other non-GAAP measures.
Entities must now:
Clearly define each MPM
Reconcile each MPM to the nearest IFRS-defined subtotal
Disclose explanations, rationale and consistency of application
This framework aims to enhance transparency around customised performance metrics.
Enhanced Disaggregation Requirements
IFRS 18 significantly raises the threshold for disaggregation. Entities must:
Break down material income and expense items into more granular components
Avoid overly broad or “catch-all” line items
Provide entity-specific breakdowns, not boilerplate disclosures
This will require detailed mapping and improved data capture within accounting systems.
Disclosure of “Unusual” Income and Expenses
Entities must separately disclose items that:
Are not expected to recur in the near term, and
Significantly affect the understanding of financial performance.
The standard prescribes how these items must be described and reconciled, improving comparability across entities.
Key Implications for Singapore Companies
1. Mandatory Restatement of Comparatives
For 2027 reporting, entities must restate all comparative periods using the new IFRS 18 structure. This includes:
Reclassifying prior-year income and expenses
Reconstructing MPMs for earlier periods
Providing comparative disclosures for “unusual” items
Practically, companies must be IFRS 18-ready for 2026 financials.
2. Revisions to the Chart of Accounts and Accounting Policies
To align with the new categories, entities will need to:
Re-map GL accounts to operating, investing, and financing classifications
Update internal accounting policies
Establish rules for consistent classification across reporting periods
3. ERP, System and Reporting Impacts
IFRS 18 will require:
More granular data collection
New P&L mapping structures
Additional reporting templates and automated reconciliations
Early system assessment is critical to avoid bottlenecks close to adoption.
4. Potential Impact on KPIs, Covenants and Investor Communication
New required subtotals and category definitions may affect:
KPI calculations (e.g., operating profit, EBITDA variants)
Bank covenants tied to performance metrics
Investor presentations and management commentary
Entities should evaluate these impacts proactively.
5. Expanded Narrative and Note Disclosures
IFRS 18 introduces new disclosure obligations relating to:
MPM definitions and reconciliations
Category-specific accounting policies
Disaggregation analyses
Unusual income and expense items
Disclosure preparation will require coordination across finance, operations, and management.
Preparing for 1 January 2027: Actions to Take Now
1. Conduct an IFRS 18 Gap Assessment
Evaluate:
Required P&L restructures
Classification impacts
Disaggregation and data gaps
Effects on KPIs, covenants, and management reporting
2. Begin Comparative Restatement Planning
Start re-mapping trial balances for 2024–2026 to ensure:
Sufficient granularity for retrospective presentation
Availability of historical data for MPM reconciliations
3. Redesign Chart of Accounts and Update Policies
Define the entity’s approach to:
Category classification
Identification of unusual items
MPM definitions, governance and reconciliation processes
4. Upgrade ERP and Reporting Tools
Ensure systems can:
Capture the granularity required
Track category-level information
Produce IFRS 18-compliant statements and disclosures
5. Train Finance Teams and Engage Stakeholders
Training should focus on:
New P&L structure
Disaggregation requirements
MPM rules and disclosure obligations
Stakeholders such as audit committees, banks, and investors should be briefed early.
6. Perform Dry Runs Before 2026
Trial restatements help identify:
- Classification inconsistencies
Missing data
System limitations
Impacts on covenants and KPIs
Conclusion — Early Preparation Is Critical
Although IFRS 18 applies from 1 January 2027, the need to restate comparative periods means companies must begin preparing well in advance. Early assessment, system readiness, and robust policy development are essential to ensure a smooth transition.
If you require assistance with IFRS 18 impact assessments, comparative restatement planning, policy updates, or full implementation support, our team is ready to help.
